WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush, facing opposition from both parties over his plan to send more troops to Iraq, said he has the authority to act no matter what Congress wants.
"I fully understand they could try to stop me from doing it. But I've made my decision. And we're going forward," Bush told CBS' "60 Minutes" in an interview to air Sunday night.
Vice President Dick Cheney asserted that lawmakers' criticism will not influence Bush's plans and he dismissed any effort to "run a war by committee."
"The president is the commander in chief. He's the one who has to make these tough decisions," Cheney said.
The defiant White House stance comes as both the House and Senate, now controlled by Democrats, prepare to vote on resolutions that oppose additional U.S. troops in Iraq. Cheney said those nonbinding votes would not affect Bush's ability to carry out his policies.
"He's the guy who's got to decide how to use the force and where to deploy the force," Cheney said. "And Congress obviously has to support the effort through the power of the purse. So they've got a role to play, and we certainly recognize that. But you also cannot run a war by committee."
Any attempts to block Bush's efforts would undermine the troops, Cheney said. He took particular aim at Democratic lawmakers who have blasted the president for increasing troops despite opposition from Congress, military advisers and a disgruntled electorate that in November ousted the Republicans as the majority party on Capitol Hill.
"They have absolutely nothing to offer in its place," Cheney said of Democratic leaders. "I have yet to hear a coherent policy from the Democratic side."
Yet many Republican lawmakers, too, have begun to criticize Bush's war management. Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel, for example, said last week he feared Bush's plan would be the worst foreign policy blunder since the Vietnam War.
Responding to that, Cheney said the most dangerous blunder would be to give up on the global fight against terrorism because the United States has decided the war in Iraq is too difficult. That is just what America's terrorist enemies are counting on, he said.
"They're convinced that the United States will pack it in and go home if they just kill enough of us," Cheney said. "They can't beat us in a standup fight, but they think they can break our will."
Bush announced last week he will send 21,500 more troops to Iraq to halt violence, mainly around Baghdad, as an essential step toward stabilizing the country's government. That plan -- along with economic and political steps -- are meant to allow Iraqis to move ahead with securing the country themselves and allow U.S. troops to gradually return home. (Full story)
Like Bush, though, Cheney said Americans need to look at the war in Iraq as part of a much longer effort.
"This is an existential conflict," Cheney said. "It is the kind of conflict that's going to drive our policy and our government for the next 20 or 30 or 40 years. We have to prevail and we have to have the stomach for the fight long term."
The White House also said Sunday that Iranians are aiding the insurgency in Iraq and the U.S. has the authority to pursue them because they "put our people at risk."
"We are going to need to deal with what Iran is doing inside Iraq," national security adviser Stephen Hadley said.
Added Cheney: "Iran is fishing in troubled waters inside Iraq."
The U.S. military in Baghdad said five Iranians arrested in northern Iraq last week were connected to an Iranian Revolutionary Guard faction that funds and arms insurgents in Iraq.
"We do not want them doing what they can to destabilize the situation inside Iraq," Cheney said.
Bush's revised war strategy seeks to isolate Iran and Syria, which the U.S. has accused of fueling attacks in Iraq. The president also says Iran and Syria have not done enough to block terrorists from entering Iraq over their borders.
"We know there are jihadists moving from Syria into Iraq. ... We know also that Iran is supplying elements in Iraq that are attacking Iraqis and attacking our forces," Hadley said.
"What the president made very clear is these are activities that are going on in Iraq that are unacceptable. They put our people at risk. He said very clearly that we will take action against those. We will interdict their operations, we will disrupt their supply lines, we will disrupt these attacks," Hadley said.
"We are going to need to deal with what Iran is doing inside Iraq."
Iran's government denied the five detainees were involved in financing and arming insurgents and said they should be released.
Hadley was interviewed on "This Week" on ABC and "Meet the Press" on NBC. Cheney was on "Fox News Sunday."
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
1.) Do you think that President should send more troops to Iraq?
2.)Do you think it is fair that the troops dont have a choice because the President is Commander in Chief?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
I thought this was a very informational article. Now i understand what Bush might do to stop Iraq.
1. Personally, yes because if its nessasary and it will contribute to winning the war.
2. Yes, because the men and women who want to be loyal to their countries want to be in the army.
I thought this article was very intersting because no I know what cheney thinks about the war and that the president will seclude two countries.
1. No I dont think that preident Bush should send troops to iraq because many of them miss their families.
2. No i dont think it is fair because people should be able to make their own disions.
1. No, I don't think President Bush should send more troops to Iraq because too many Americans are being killed and it will be harsh on their famies and close friends.
2. No its not fair in my opinion I beleive people should be able to make their own decisions once they are over the age of 18.
Wow this was a very informative article, very long but interesting, but another 21,500 trops there I dont know what he`s thinking.
1. I personally dont know if its a good idea or not because I am not up to date with EVERYTHING happening in the war so i dont know but from my perspective "no".
2. Well I think its somewhat fair to not have a choice beacuse if u sighned up you should be ready to go but if they were just randomn from draft cards I think thats wrong.
This story had good information, however I think there was more than there was needed.
1.I don't think that they should sent more troops to Iraq because if our country was attacked we would need all the troops we can get. Also I think we will just lose ore lives in Iraq.
2.I think that the government has the right to send the troops to where ever they want because if they joined the armky to serve the country they must follow orders.
1. I personaly do not think that president Bush should send more troops but if it would help win the war then I guess it would be ok.
2. I dont think its fair that the troops have no choice because they are the ones who are putting there lives in danger for their country not the president.
1. No Bush should not send more troops. I say this because I think that will stir the enemy up and they will increase thier violence level or bomb more cars or things to fight us off.
2. In a way it is because they choose to be in the army but if they dont want to go then it isnt. I think it depends on how you look at it.
I think this was an interesting article because I didn't know how Cheney and Bush felt about sending more troops
1. I think sending more troops to Iraq will help win the war but I also think we will need more than just more troops to win.
2. No because they are being loyal enough and they did serve our country they should be able to make there own decision.
1).What is our presdient thinking. Sending more troops into Iraq. This is so wrong. He is taking men and women and putting them there where they should not be. He has no clue how this is affecting the citizens of the U.S. if he did he would pull them back and stop the meham. I think we should protest about this. We can't get introuble for it unless we damage proporety but we wont.
2).I do not think it is fair that men and women have a choice because it is their life and should have a say in this dumb war. I know that I am thinking about joing the army.
1.In my opinion I dont think President Bush should send more Troops to Iraq, but if it will help end the war then I will agree with what he's doing.
2. I think the government has the right to do pretty much whatever they want with the army because if the people who signed up for the army should be willingly to go to Iraq and fight.
1- I think that President Bush should not send more troops to Iraq because most of the people that are in the troops are only kids; they also should be able to spend more time with their family.
2- Yes I think that it is fair that Bush is sending troops to Iraq without having them choose because going into the army, they knew that they were going leave and go somewhere. It is also fair because it is their job .
I have two older brother's who could be sent to war so I found this article very interesting and now I feel a little more informed of what's going on in the war.
1)Well yes because without troops to fight in the war we really could'nt do anything.
2)I don't think that's fair to people.If they do not want to participate in the war they should'nt have to even if it is for a good cause.
1. No, I do not think the president should send more troops to war because too many lives are being taken.
2. I do not think it is fair if the troops don't have a choice. I think in order to be in the war, a soldier should feel proud and honored to represent their country. However, many people do not want to risk their lives. They should be able to decide themselves.
1) I don't think President Bush should send more troops to Iraq because many have already died, and this war seems endless, which means that many soldiers will die if President Bush sends them.
2) Yes, I think it is fair, because people are doing what they feel is good for them, their families and the country. People who are in the army are probably in because they want to.
Post a Comment